X
- No products in your cart.
X
- No products in your cart.
Joseph Sabino, a 20-year LTC pharmacy expert, recently explained why manual e-kits and stat dose storage in long-term care facilities is so problematic.
Yet manually storing medication doses in the cheap plastic tackle box is still so common. As principal of LTCRx Solutions (Columbus, OH), he has seen the ugly risks of ignoring technology that could improve operations and save money — technology like Capsa’s NexsysADC.
I spent the last 20 years of my career in management of long term care pharmacies in Ohio which altogether serviced more than 30,000 skilled, intermediate care, assisted living, jail and group home beds. These pharmacies pioneered the use of technology to improve the accuracy, security, and accountability of medications dispensed into the facilities they serviced.
One of the major problems which I saw during those years was the use of a manual “tackle box” type system to keep emergency or contingency drug supplies in long term care facilities. These drug supplies were kept in a locked tackle box or cabinet and the key would be under the control of a charge nurse. In general, when a dose was needed, the nurse would open the box, remove the needed medication and fill out a charge slip which was to be completed and sent to the pharmacy for billing and replacement.
These systems can cause a host of problems for the pharmacy and the facility. The first is security. Once a box or cabinet is opened, there is no way to verify what is actually removed since everything in the system is available. There is no way to determine when the system was opened. There is no way to absolutely identity who opened it. As a result, these systems can become a ready source for diversion of drugs, particularly controlled substances. This may create regulatory problems for the pharmacy and the facility.
The other major problem is accountability. Sometimes a nurse in a hurry would neglect to complete the reorder slip. The slip could get lost en route to the pharmacy or be inadvertently thrown away. The result is a missing dose that may go unnoticed until the next pharmacy audit or when the next dose is needed and not available. Although most of these problems were inadvertent, they often caused bad feelings between the facilities and pharmacy.
The final problem is the cost to reconcile these manual systems. I cannot begin to count the time lost which my consultant pharmacists spent going through patient charts attempting to find the patient who may have received the missing dose. The facilities also incurred cost for their nurses working with the pharmacists to account for missing doses.
The pharmacies that I managed began to utilize technology to solve these problems. We installed automated systems in our larger and higher acuity facilities. They gave us much better control of the emergency and contingency drug supplies in these facilities. Systems have been improved over the years and offer better security and accountability.
Yes, there is a cost to utilize an automated system. Much of this will be offset by reducing lost billing for missing doses, staff time wasted trying to reconcile manual systems, and outside fees to couriers or employees driving missing doses to facilities. But speaking from experience, I know that security and accountability absolutely have value, and the investment in automated systems does pay off. Plus, providers of this technology often have scalable systems and smaller cabinet versions for tighter formularies, smaller number of residents, or restricted budgets.
Read more about Capsa’s NexsysADC, available in main cabinet and 4T countertop size: https://www.capsahealthcare.com/product/nexsysadc-automated-dispensing-cabinet/